Article snippet: Posted at 4:00 pm on July 22, 2017 by streiff Yesterday, the Washington Post dropped a story alleging, with the same impeccable sourcing that we’ve become used to, that Sessions had two “substantive” conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that had not been disclosed. I’m sort of with Patterico on this. I’m not sure what difference this really makes even on the outside chance that it is true. If Sessions did lie, the only person who can do anything about it is Trump. It isn’t like the Senate gets a re-do on the vote. And, as Eric Holder demonstrated, even if the Senate votes a criminal contempt citation, that doesn’t mean Sessions is a) fired, b) prosecuted, c) loses his law license, or d) that anyone even cares. But the story was hardly out and this rumor started circulating. This Trump tweet was used as evidence of the plot because, you will note, that Trump doesn’t say Sessions didn’t do it, he only complains about the leak because, as we know, all of Trump’s tweets are meticulously researched. Likewise we are assured there is some linkage between Trump’s interview on Wednesday and this story running Friday. Sorry, sometimes, most of the times, a cigar is just a cigar. Ask yourself have you seen any evidence 1) that the White House communications operation is able to pull off a precisely timed event like this or 2) that opposing factions in the White House would not have ratted out the plot long before its execution? I try to give the White... Link to the full article to read more